Quote:
Originally Posted by leinad
I know it may not be supported by some, but without trying to cross a border line of argument on this thread, here is one video I saw that has good scientific argument for/against a conspiracy theory situation.
Comments welcome
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO2yT0uBQbM |
So we have a new conspiracy. An expert, which we have to take the desk's word on, states a feasible point of view which most of us can't verify. The only way it can be resolved is that if more experts come out in support and it is then investigated scientifically. If there has been no follow up research, it must be assumed no-one took it seriously. Being an architect, is he just trying to defend his colleagues in the design of the buildings? He definitely underplayed the role of the airplane fuel but is that accurate- this is outside his expertise. The weight of the collapsing floors above just might be sufficient to collapse the heat weakened structures below. If you were going to demolish the buildings why bother with the planes?
My view, Rob