View Single Post
  #61  
Old 24-05-2009, 01:03 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,484
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpastern View Post
I doubt that many people are going to honestly be able to tell the difference between an image taken with a 12" GSO RC and a 12.5" RCOS RC. At least, when both units are properly collimated, decent mounts are used, good tracking, good exposures and the same CCD imaging gear. ........
Dave
That may well prove to be prophetic....but I'm still inclined to adopt a wait and see approach.

However I don't think the value of albeit less expensive, but good RC telescope, will affect RCOS anymore than a luxury Hyuandai would affect S-Class Benz sales.

A 12.5" optical set (from Star Instruments, the RCOS supplier) alone will set you back a cool $US6000..... Why? For starters the optics are Zygo tested and certified to 1/25th wave RMS, and have thermal properties an order of magnitude better (actually 20x better) than the fuzed quartz by GSO. (BTW this talk of 500% mark-ups is utter nonsense)

I applaud Paul's ingenuity. By adding a more robust and accurate focuser and adapting 3rd party field flattner to a modest scope, plus putting the ensemble on a top-of-the-line mount, he is indeed getting a great result!

But we are hardly talking about "cheap" systems out of the made in China box anymore.
Reply With Quote