View Single Post
  #15  
Old 23-05-2009, 11:00 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,283
Agreed not all business people are out to screw their employees as in all situations the actions of a minority should not be construed to represent the majority.

My point here is they ie: the Govt don't see the forest because of the trees

not all situations are the same and where do you draw the line they become ardently inflexible and unreasonable because the are hindered by stringent policy

someone should draw the curtains

I'm not out to rip off the system all I'm trying to do ids look for a fair go why change policy in such a way as to affect all when a small portion are the rorters

eg: if you contribute more than $200 p/fn into super as SS and you pre taxable income exceeds $60000 per annum then if your taxable income is between $60000-80000 pa 50% of this amount will be deemed as taxable income and between $80000-100000 75% as so forth

lateral thinking
Reply With Quote