Hmm Just wondering
Hi guys, I sent this question to a very experienced imager here on IIS, and although It was just a recent PM, I did not expect an answer just yet, so to my PM'ed person, please don't feel offended because I put this out there, I thought some different feedback could be helpful.
The Question being.
* In comparison of image quality, which one of these instruments would give the better image, and why please.
FSQ-106 or, Canon 500mm F/4.0L IS USM, or would they both be pretty equal in their performance.
I love my Tak, and it is crisp and clear, but would a 500mm equal it's performance.
Thank You.
Leon