Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley
Hmm, expect more what does that mean?
|
The ML8300 (with 5.4um) + 180 (which has a theoretical res of .66 arc). If I've crunched the numbers correctly, you're getting .88 arcsec - oversampled data...which is always better than undersampled, but I'm wondering if you're running any deconvolution here. I'd expect the stars and details to really "pop". Wouldn't the U16 be a better match?