View Single Post
  #13  
Old 15-02-2009, 06:20 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Well, for wide field, its unnecessary methinks. Ive done a lot of testing and have seen a fair bit of drama to do with automation (far to much ), your heading for grief with an OAG generally. Also, its expensive to automate OAG rotation to find a guide star, and youll need plate solving and integration with The Sky (or a guide star catalog) to do it properly.

Yes, flexure is a problem, but guide cam focusing isnt, at all. So I bolted my guide cam to the imaging OTA to (almost) eliminate flexure and shift/movement and havent focused for 2 yrs, its irrelivant. Focus once and forget about it.

Unless your doing 15min plus exposures at more than 2m FL and are a precision fanatic, external guiding is MUCH easier, very especially if you want to automate your rig.
I agree with Fred. I have in the past mainly used SBig cameras with their selfguiding which is handy most of the time except for Ha etc.

I now use an external guide scope and camera and its too easy. I never have trouble finding a guide star and the guiding is more accurate not less.

I am imaging at 1260mm focal length.
Greg.
Reply With Quote