Quote:
Originally Posted by mill
The way you have worded it, makes it appear as if Bintel has inside information and S&S is gone under already.
|
I'm sorry, mate...but I just can't agree with you.
Nowhere in that very simple two sentences in the original post could anyone get that inference.
1st sentence - a simple observation or pointing out of what Bintel is reporting. Nothing more, nothing less.
2nd sentence - offering up their 'comment' for comment or feedback of a more concrete nature.
If anything, it is a call to repudiate their report. I am just the messenger.
I fail to see how you can eschew such a standpoint from the two very short sentences posted. There is just simply not enough content there for it to be any more than what it is: a call for verification or denial of the content posted by
Bintel.
I'm not sure how you've managed to find a negative in the purpose of my original post...but congrats...you done a fine job!
And for the record...again...as I've stated in prior posts in this thread...I too would like to see this magazine make a comeback. Just in case we weren't clear enough of where I stand on this, or lest I be accused of having a hidden agenda.
