Compared to the Celestron X-cel series, the FOV on the Meade is 5° greater which is excellent. But the eye-relief (e-r)on the Meade is only 14.8mm, compared with 20mm on the Celestron. This is maintained throughout the Celestron range, whereas the e-r on the Meade eps decrease with decreasing f.l. eg. its down to 10.4mm on the 14mm ep.
How would you compare the image quality of these brands of ep Brendan, given that they are in a similar price range?
Since I wear glasses, would the eye-relief available on the Meade be adequate.
Just reading back through the thread, I think I may now have answered my original Q.
But would nevertheless always be interested to hear any further comments.