View Single Post
  #12  
Old 03-01-2009, 08:41 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Mixed bag of results. The real dif is in the initial processing. No 1 is processed the way I normally do it, using Photoshop for all stretching and manipulation.

The second image was stacked in IP3 then Digital developed in IP before being moved into CS3. I sort of feel like I am flying blind with Digital Dev so I don't use it, prefering CS3 for all.The reduction of dim stars may well be just a mouse click in the final stages.

Personally I like No 1 to me it doesn't exhibit as much nebulosity but it does appear somewhat smoother and more realistic.

Who Knows.
Reply With Quote