Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuts
Why is this a con?
|
perhaps because the producers of the energy are not being asked to change their practices and it is left to the consumer to do so.
which does not mean that consumers should not do their bit but i can see it working this way:
Consumer needs to go without a bright light (50 W instead of 100 W) = consumer loses
Producer changes production process (green methods, carbon capture-hah!, etc.) and charges consumer extra = consumer loses and producer wins
this is my poorly understood take on it...
