Quote:
Originally Posted by g__day
M-Theory or Membrane theory abstracts that reality (in all its 10 dimensional glory), exists on (shorthand) branes - and there can be alot of them. Each has its own rules of physics and physical constants. Our entire Universe is one.
Occassionally branes can interact to form a new brane. A discernible amount of energy may be released - think big bang. Interactions don't have to be cataclysmic (a whole two branes come into resonance aand create a new brane). Virtual particles could be a particles from one brane tunneling into ours for a while before returning. Heinsenberg is definitely on the cards here. It looks like his probablity law (for a finite time in a finite location you can break any law of physics with a finite probabilty - often used in wave mechanics to describe how waves work) is turning out to be the most involate law in physics - firmer even than relativity.
|
I had a go at working out a geometric grid in which to fit everything such that each point had an infinite probability of being "hit" by a particle coming from every direction.(of variable velocity but generaly with an expectation to being a high percentage of C simply to limit varability in this region.. although this met that it sounds as though all particles would arrive at a point all at the same time we are never the less dealing with probability and even with an infinite probability expectation there is no reason to suggest that the outcome of the expected probability can nevertheless be zero...and the variables are appart from velocity are tragectories.. even to allow for a grid to manage particle points using as may no variables the task is beyond me...but so as strange as this approach sounds it enables description of then reasonable expectations by reference to the adjoining points a separation of time and distance ..with this additional input we can be more certain
. so I then thought I can understand why one would give up on an eather approach as to fit matter into such a grid then becomes interesting...however when one does which I have tried with a particle point firstly that irrespective of the enormous varibility available via the real probability of infinite probability (there is no other way to express management of the large variations available and any numeric qualification somewhat irrellevant to the pattens using high infinite input.... and so the traffic flow would see particles interacting in waves simply to be able to pass by each other all travelling at approx c... so that is interesting.
What made it more interesting was not to set a limit on the size of the grid scribed by the points.. almost as if you could describe the smallest cube but then be able to carve it into an additional multiplicity of points which will allow more intimate description of levels such that if there were a HB paricle (and there must be some particle finally) scribing all or any fields that its internals could be descibed as if we were describing JUpiter.
So I gave up on the math side and use my imagination but I get into a search downways in size and outwise in size... and wonder if either direction could be infinite...
Anyways just got back been driving all night and was thinking about this all the way up...12 hours...
alex
alex