Quote:
Originally Posted by jase
Nice work Dennis. A significant improvement to your last. I don't think you've overdone the deconvolution. If anything, I think you can tighten up the details and stars even further. Perhaps try a few more iterations to confirm the theory and validate how much the data will accept before artifacts arise. Given the over sampling of your imaging rig, deconv can work wonders on the data. Colours look good, so you balance is on the money. Re: decon, try a few different strengths and save them as separate images. You can then blend each image within PS providing greater control of the detail extraction and avoid any halos around the stars. Look forward to seeing more.  |
Thanks Jase – it has been a real help having the M16 LRGB example you did for me, it made the penny drop! Previously I had been thrashing around, making ad-hoc adjustments and your M16 re-process has provided me with a defined approach which I can now repeat.
I was a little unsure about the de-conv and found that Max Ent gave a better result than RL, so I’ll certainly have more of a play around. Now that I have a better understanding of layers, the whole process has become so much clearer; and more importantly, fun!
Cheers
Dennis