View Single Post
  #23  
Old 12-10-2008, 04:40 AM
CoombellKid
Registered User

CoombellKid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by ausastronomer View Post
Rob,

It has nothing to do with ego.

Having servocat on a 10" scope effectively turns it into a 12" scope by allowing you to resolve much fainter detail in dim targets, as a result of the accurate tracking and increased comfort.

The motorised tracking is the big benefit, goto is neither here nor there.
Unfortunately John and I hate to burst your bubble but it's still just a 10"
scope, it's a simple thing called physics . And as for comfortability and
increased detail, where is the science that points to this. I think it's a
more subjective thing than actual reality.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ausastronomer View Post
Why do you think double star and planetary observers put their 4" refractors on a tracking eq mount, which generally costs more than servocat (for a good one) for a telescope less than 1/2 the size of my 10" ? Ego ?

Cheers,
John B
Well I really dont think your comparison is a good one, kinda like comparing
apples and bannanas. Besides most of the setups you are comparing to
usually have dirty great big cameras attached to them. Have a close look
when your at your next star party. And probably why they dont use 10"
dobs with servocat installed I thought this is about servocat on
small dobs

In the end it's all about what floats your boat, ego or scope

regards,CS
Reply With Quote