View Single Post
  #9  
Old 26-08-2008, 07:05 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satchmo View Post
SCT's unfortunately give the poorest image quality due to surface roughness on mass produced elements and large ( 40 % cenetral obstruction at the secondary baffle )
No doubt, Mark.

However, they do a very good job for the job I assign them, which is plantary imaging.

From a visual performance perspective.....well...

Not that I'm saying they are rubbish for good ol' fashioned eyeballin'...

I just don't think that's where its true strength rests. Just my opinion, SCT fans
Reply With Quote