View Single Post
  #2  
Old 24-08-2008, 05:39 PM
chris lewis
Registered User

chris lewis is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: auckland
Posts: 191
Hi. The Saxon 767 AZ is a very basic entry level ‘departmental’ store type reflector telescopes.
Unfortunately it cannot really be recommended for astronomical use.
The mirror being 76 mm [or 3 in.] is too small to give you any decent images.
The mirror is also an inferior ‘spherical’ type mirror which will also add to the poor quality images. [ Most astronomical reflectors have a superior ‘parabolic’ type mirror which reduces distortions and improves the overall image - this is important in the more 'shorter' tube reflectors - this Saxon addmitedly is a 'longer' F/9 type so any disortions will not be as bad.].
The mount is a ‘yoke’ type - which is the most inferior type of mount you can get. This mount is very unsteady and it is very difficult to get and keep an object in view - esp. moving astronomical images. A good solid mount is a vital part of a telescope.
You will soon get frustrated with a telescope and mount like this and for new comers this will be a major disappointment.
I have used telescopes for 40 years and have seen many people buy telescopes like this only to be come frustrated with them. They usually end up in garages gathering dust or handed on to other family members.
Prior to buying a telescope if you read some of the reviews and if possible talk to some other amateur astronomers to get their opinions. This may help you decide what telescope is best for you.
If at all if you could visit a 'star type party' to view through different types of telescopes you will see at first hand what is best for you and your budget.
However - just as a suggestion - if you do want to get a decent ‘starter’ reflector telescope attempt to get a 6 in. 'Dobsonian' type reflector from a known astronomical shop and made by a reputable telescope maker. This will give you good images and is an easy telescope to set up and use.
Good luck.

Last edited by chris lewis; 24-08-2008 at 08:43 PM.
Reply With Quote