Cheers Bert. Yes, wide fields and deconvolution don't always agree. Comes back to your arcsec/pixel sampling too. Though one thing I enjoy with wide fields is hybrid imaging - adding data from a longer focal length instrument to give the image depth.
Here is an example. TOA150 was used for deeper luminance. The FSQ was used for RGB and the overall wide field panorama. So you're not always limited by wide field imaging. I find it good to strike a balance between narrow and wide. Processing is different between the two, though there is still the foundation of knowing what you wish to convey through stretching etc. Thanks again for your comments. Much appreciated.
