[jase (Jason)]

Originally Posted by avandonk

Jase you are still an evil evil man seducing us poor imagers into a never ending chase for imaging perfection.

The detail is stunning but I think I need more practice with my humble setup before I launch into imaging nirvana.

Anyway it is not the destination that is important but the journey!

Thanks for all the fish!

Bert

Thanks Bert! This image is certainly far from perfection (if such a thing exists). I don't like comparing side by side images, but when you compare the hubble image, the resolution is pretty darn good for a ground based telescope. I maybe able to extract more from the Ha luminance through iterative deconvolution blends, but I'm not sure if its worth it considering the scale. I fully concur, the journey is important as a strong foundation puts one in good stead to reaching nirvana. Thanks again.

Originally Posted by danielsun

Wow Jase!!
Another ripper!!!

Cheers Daniel.

Thanks Dan. Pleased you liked it.

Originally Posted by Dennis

What a superbly detailed image - the 1600x1200 size is stunning! It’s nice to see all the wonderful detail in this object after my abject failure at the Qld Astrofest to record anything more than a dim haze of nebulosity.

I was probably as excited as the (blue inner) oxygen atoms when I first saw the larger image - top stuff Jase!

Cheers

Dennis

Thank you kindly Dennis. The upscaled data seems to hold the resolution well. I'm not going to deny its a tough target. Certainly need long exposures to bring out the details. The U42 camera is NABG, but still required 15min subs through narrowband filters. Alvin did a good job on the acquisition. I think I would have only gone 10min subs and suffered with serious noise when stretching. Thanks again for your comments.

Originally Posted by strongmanmike

You (and the professional gear) certainly revealed the knots in this shot, excellent! I know this has been discussed a bit before but since it is a great example, out of interest, do you think this image would really belong in an "amateur" imaging contest (should you enter it) given that the raw materials were ordered and done remotely at a commercial observatory with equipment similar or in fact better than that available at Siding Spring Observatory? Just a thought.

Good that you didn't have to pay this time but why would you be reluctant to reveal the cost in other cases? Is it a secret that you can't share? Would be enlightening for some of us I think?

Yes I recon an even tighter framing would be cool too and yes even without the stars, you should try with this image even.

Mike

I'm not going to fall into that debate again Mike. As it stands, clearly the competition rules don't work and I think you know where I stand...either CWAS/DM awards allow it or not. IMHO, it would be very foolish if they are not visionary in their regulations and embrace this form of imaging. That said, I'm fine for it to be placed in another category to keep you (and others) happy. 24" RC better than Siding Spring's 2.3m scope...who are you kidding?

hahaha I have nothing to hide. Its my business how much I spend on remote imaging and I choose not to disclose such information - simple. Why don't you create an account on the LightBuckets site. Joining is free. You'll find all the information you need, pricing, scope configurations, availability, remote weather reports etc. If you want more information, post your questions on the forum there. The guys are friendly and approachable. Speak with Fred to see if he'll get you some time on GRAS if you're keen. The number of remote imaging players is growing... there is choice. You're a member of MRO aren't you? They've got a 12.5" RC a few guys in the US are using...