Quote:
Originally Posted by jase
...and to think the keen imagers here on this forum would lead you astray Mike.  We're only trying to help you out. You've worked hard acquiring the data, why not display it's full potential. This rendition has the goods. I'm assuming you applied it to the entire image considering you're not keen on using masks or did you simply use the inverted colour range tool? Well done - knew you'd crack, welcome to the noise-a-phobes.  |
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN
not that I didnt love it before, but its definitely been improved by the noise reduction...
Im interested to learn how this is done. any pointers?
In the past i've ran things like noiseware ce. but that I take it is a pretty crude way of going about things.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by marc4darkskies
Muuuuuuuuch nicer Mike!!  I can even see the bark on the trees now!   Look at the detail in 7418!!
And look, the jpg is 2M smaller!! Just think of all the extra space you'll save on your PC by not trying to compress noise!
Very nice mate!! 
Cheers, Marcus |
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman
I like it, Mike! Much nicer indeed.
|
you guys are great
It is a good feeling being able to admit when you are w....ro....n...? nup!