[Outbackmanyep]

Originally Posted by Chrissyo

Why do you think this?
On what are you basing this?
Are you familiar with the technology/techniques used to transmit the data from the Moon to the Earth?
If so, what was inadequate for this to occur and what do you think would have been required?

If the footage was faked, how did they distribute it?
How would they keep everyone involved quiet?

Finally, if the footage is fake as you suggest, how would they have gone about faking all aspects of lunar EVA flawlessly - 1/6th gravity, zero atmosphere, miles upon miles of 'lunar surface' evenly illuminated with only one light source, etc?

I'd like to add to Chrissyo's words here......

What about the guys at Honeysuckle Creek,who actually recorded the data and dialogue of the received transmissions of the Apollo 11 landing, and Parkes Radio telescope which also received transmissions from the moon. Ask anyone who was there at PKS or HSC (if they're still alive) where exactly the dishes were pointing when the information came through.......Are you going to call these guys spokes in the Hoaxing wheel too??
I'm sorry, but there was too much going on involving thousands of people and researchers to conclude that the landings could have been faked.
Ask how many "non-believers" how many men walked on the moon and i bet that a common response would be 2. How many "non-believers" would have seen footage from the other landings?? Explain the parabolic arcs of dust coming from the astronauts boots while walking on the moon.....how would they be reproduced in an Earth-like environment???



The "Face on Mars" has been dealt with in High-Res fashion, and when the Apollo landers are being photographed, so will all the Surveyor probes and the Lunik probes and all the Saturn Rocket stages that ended up there too!
Hopefully that will settle the argument, but while ever there is doubt there will be controversy.

I'm a believer.

PS...I thought they found the Apollo 11 tapes in Australia??