Thread: crayford bk7
View Single Post
  #21  
Old 22-07-2005, 03:03 PM
MiG's Avatar
MiG
Registered User

MiG is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bentleigh, Melbourne
Posts: 246
Quote:
Originally Posted by ausastronomer
Thats not quite correct either...
That was an interesting post. I had forgotten to consider things other than thermal properties.
I found a site that has the properties of mirror substrates and the steady and transient thermal distortion characteristics of BK7 are between 1.5 and 2 times as good as plate glass. But just stiffness is not much higher (73.1 vs 81 GPa).
http://www.minerals.sk.ca/atm_design...als/plate.html
http://www.minerals.sk.ca/atm_design/materials/bk7.html
Substrates page
An interesting thing is this sentence at the top of the page:

"As a telescope mirror material, BK7 is still much more expensive and inferior to many other possible choices."

I know this may make me look argumentative, but I like to get to the bottom of things when involved in discussions of a quantitative nature. I don't mean to disrespect you or anyone else.
Reply With Quote