View Single Post
  #10  
Old 20-05-2008, 04:51 PM
cpoc
Registered User

cpoc is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyH155 View Post
COR! Read that stuff on spaceinfo.com It sure is scary what they are trying to do... Landing with a fighter plane radar, 12 separate rockets, a parachute that might come down on top of it, electric motors many years old., some hardware with no redundancy... Wow, if it gets down what an achievement that will be
It's not rocket science.... oh wait yes it is

I've always loved the "Scotty" approach to space exploration... MIR designed to last 5 years... lasted 15. Any number of deep space probes designed to last a relatively short time.... still sending data from the furthest reaches of our solar system (well furthest we have yet reached anyway).

But it's reading things like that, that make you feel it's reasonable that a few probes have had a less than successful landing (though that one that was a result of an error between metric and imperial was a bit of an embarrassment).

Looking forward to the results
Reply With Quote