View Single Post
  #5  
Old 13-05-2008, 09:29 AM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
I know that taking images from a remote scope isnt the same as actually taking the photo... But I thought i'd wack this up to show what the Global Rent A Scope system is capable of...
Great start on DSO imaging. Well done.

I find it amusing that people think that acquiring data from a remote telescope is different from acquiring it on your own gear. Technically, it doesn't matter where you acquire it from. The data you collect still needs to be processed. Remote imaging doesn't magically turn you into a pro. As you progress down this winding road of astrophotography, you'll soon realise that acquiring the data is the simple component. Its the image processing, that consumes most of your time.

I like Gary Kopff's summarised post:
"As most astrophotography tends to be a bit like an iceberg, with 75% of the work going on 'beneath the surface' in the post-processing when you get back home, it requires a lot of patience when in the field and this may not be everyone's cup of tea while you stand around in the cold and dark doing the actual imagery." - http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=23213

The latter statements in the quote change with remote imaging. As it provides the ability to acquire data in the comfort of your lounge room or while spending time with family during the evening. Using remote gear doesn't provide instant success. You still need to work to get the best result from the acquired data (the 75%).

I will acknowledge that having some hands on skill in acquiring your own data does assist and provides a greater appreciation for the work people put in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuts View Post
I am going to use my free hour on the weekend. Any suggestions on a nice high face on galaxy, not M83?
Paul
My tip for you Paul, as you've only got an hour timeslot. Acquire high resolution luminance data of a target you recently acquired with your own setup. You can then use the RGB data collected and layer it across the luminance. 6x10min 1x1 on the 12.5" RC has the ability to deliver a reasonable result. I personally wouldn't waste time on RGB. Keep in mind the moon will be close to full by the weekend - be prepared to deal with gradients. A better option would be to wait for the moon intensity to drop or get on 10" RC and acquire some narrowband SII, OIII, HA subs. You can do this on the 12.5" and shoot Ha, but at F/9 the Ha subs should be around 15mins each to get a good S/N. This would only give you 4 subs (60min). Not ideal. My point being, weigh up your options and plan your targets well in advance.
Reply With Quote