View Single Post
  #3  
Old 10-05-2008, 04:57 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
Quote:
Originally Posted by [1ponders] View Post
Nice Narayan. How are you finding the Qhy8 after the DSLR?
I really like the fact that I don't need to spend so much time taking darks...just for comparison here is an image of the same set of objects taken last year June I think -same scope but with my modded 300D-at ISO 1600- and 2 hours and 10 minutes of exposure (10 minute subs)-with an astronomik 13 nm filter . In many ways not a like for like comparison but maybe indicative

The DSLR is a little bit less sensitive I feel and a heck of a lot harder to process the DSLR images because of intrinsic noise

on the other hand more cables and stuff with the QHY and need AC power for the camera-my canon usually ran off a battery especially if I went anywhere with it. The QHY is heavier and much more expensive of course
Narayan
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ngc-3199-restacked-iso-1600.jpg)
96.1 KB30 views

Last edited by seeker372011; 10-05-2008 at 05:29 PM.
Reply With Quote