Quote:
|
Originally Posted by iceman
Like Gary, i'd like to see a side by side comparison of the same image with the filter, and one without.
Taken with the same camera settings, same length of exposure, same processing.
So.... can you do that? 
btw those images look fantastic. |
I would like to extend the comparison further to compare the Baader filter with say a Lumicon and an Astronomiks because visually it is no better IMO. Some of the other top quality UHC filters could very well have produced comparable results, who knows.
To say the "filter rocks" when you haven't compared it to other similar filters is a little misleading.
eg. Someone that has never owned a car and takes delivery of a new Diahatsu Charade, probably thinks "it really rocks", cause its way better than "no car". The guy next door who owns a Jaguar XK8, probably thinks the Diahatsu sucks. When the guy with the new diahatsu drives the JAG he realises that "the diahatsu sucks". The Baader may well be a superb filter but it needs to be compared to other similar products at the top of the tree, before you can come to that conclusion. As Gary mentioned Baader stuff is generally very good.
Excellent photos BTW Scott tremendous stuff.
CS-John B