View Single Post
  #45  
Old 03-04-2008, 06:07 PM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Eric. as here for the 350D (the 40D would be similar) the green and blue channels are unaffected by filters, they both pass through (the removal of filters is just to extend red response) red and green colours are presnt in both moded and unmoded versions (so images are still RGB). What makes the colour balance so strange with no filter is the over all extra red sensitivity and big green and smaller blue response spikes at 7000 (and another blue spike at 8200), which causes red, green and blue all to accept IR light as extra data at 7000 and beyond, causeing a washed out effect way out side normal balance. The huge red curve gives the overall red hue with something like 3 times ( more than GB) the light collection over a large frequency range.

The UV/IR blocker cuts out the 7000 and above spikes and returns colour balance with just a slightly extended red response to just before 7000. Green and blue response is then back to normal as in an unmodded cam. This is what you want for astro RGB, normal GB and a bit higher red respose to capture Ha.
Totally agree with you. I wouldn't want the red to be overly exposed but slightly more than GB which is why the UV/IR filter works best.

The 350D filter is different from the 40D filter because the 40D has 2 filters which makes things more complicated.

I have ordered a Hutech Daylight front filter should be coming shortly. Will test with this on. I don't have a UV/IR filter so i can't test with this filter but my IDAS LPS2 filter blocks the UV/IR range that is why with it infront of my lense, it looks more normal.

will keep you updated when the daylight filter arrives. im hoping soon
Reply With Quote