Quote:
Originally Posted by glenc
Magnificent image again Jase.
I find IC405 a difficult visual target, the nearby IC410 is easier.
Maybe my eyes are more sensitive to red than blue.
|
Thanks Glen. I'd imagine it would be a tough visual target, at least from Oz.
Quote:
Originally Posted by theodog
Nice one Jase
|
Cheers Jeff.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alchemy
looks incredibly 3D.
heaps of detail there jase.
|
Cheers Alchemy. On reflection, I think I could have processed this differently (could have been a little harder on the noise reduction), but for now it will suffice. Thanks again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut
Good one Jase, the blue nebulosity gives it a 3d look, nice change from a sea of red so common nowadays from RGB widefield.
|
Thanks Fred.
Indeed, it is something different to what we common folk see. The wisps of blue add an extra dimension. Feels like I've been out of the imaging game for a while. Still have one more to process before I continue the photon collection process again. You got those RGB filters in yet?
Quote:
Originally Posted by rpsastronomy
Nice image jase,but how did you remotely acquire the image?
I ask because i can detect a bit of star elongation from bottom right to top left...think i got that right!
|
Cheers Rob.
http://www.global-rent-a-scope.com
Yes, very slight elongation is present. The Paramount 1100s just isn't up to the same mark as the Paramount ME with MKS4000.
Nah, to be fair, the conditions were sub optimal, with thin faint (high altitude) cloud present. Looking at the subs again, I'd say it was a guiding problem. I did throw a few subs away due to this. Thanks again.