Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman
If only it was shot in RAW it'd be heaps better 
Fantastic image, Eric. So smooth. Incredible result. |
next camera next camera
thanks mike
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon
Great image Eric once again, how is it you can take run of the mill images, while i have been banned,  and have to go for the deep stuff.
very nice indeed.
Leon  |
Cheers Leon. i had my bad times also (most) just that night was soo cold .
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty P
Eric that is a ripper of an image! 
The detail so so crisp and the colour is very pleasing to the eye.
Not much more to say than...  and  |
THanks Matty, glad that you like it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut
This irritates the crap out of me Eric. You do stuff with a DSLR (and in JPEG, you have to be KIDDING) thats just should be ILLEGAL. Your statement "DSLR killer" assumes a given image comparisment of an Astrocam and a DSLR image by the same average imager to illistrate what can be done with a given average skill set. In this case, a DSLR pic may well look similar to an Astrocam. You have only presented DSLR pics to demonstrate your skill. A fairer comparison would be YOU presenting a DSLR pic AND a 16meg US$16K cam pic, side by side. Then, you would see the difference. For a start, DSLR JEGS are 8 bit, and Astrocams are 16bit, that alone would, if you applied the skills you have, produce a spine chilling result, I dread the day  .
BTW, as Mike says, try RAW (at least 12 bit), I await with intrepidation at the result. |
Thanksss Fred for your compliments. I won't name any names, but have always seen websites labeling their CCD products "KILLS" DSLR . For them to say that is like comparing a datsun to a ferrari. im mere just rubbing it in their face that not all DSLR images gets "KILLED" by CCD's.