Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut
Whoa, Ok, its in the title, thats embarissing LOL.
You mentioned sharp tools, so did the PDF in the last line, just a poke, take it easy. Not defending Peter, just the response, actually, I guess yr point is savage but relavent, patronising shouldnt be tolerated. Sheesh I respect yr opinion, sorry for missing the PDF noise title, good point, I humbly appologise, but the dark exposure question stands, makes me doubt the authors expertise altogether (my opinion, not an expert). Robust debate, sure, I made a mistake, so hang me.
|
To be fair here Fred, the pdf is me paraphrasing a whole chapter.
The objective in R.Berry's opinion is to get the noise to a minimum and to produce the best image you can without introducing more noise as happens when you apply all the different calibration procedures.
I will review the chapters again and elucidate on the dark frame issue.(If you are interested , if not dont read the post)
I also am not an expert but I have been studying this book for a while now and it is only through discussion and review do i make any headway.
Regards
Steve
