Whoa, Ok, its in the title, thats embarissing LOL.
You mentioned sharp tools, so did the PDF in the last line, just a poke, take it easy. Not defending Peter, just the response, actually, I guess yr point is savage but relavent, patronising shouldnt be tolerated. Sheesh I respect yr opinion, sorry for missing the PDF noise title, good point, I humbly appologise, but the dark exposure question stands, makes me doubt the authors expertise altogether (my opinion, not an expert). Robust debate, sure, I made a mistake, so hang me.
|