Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut
2 way?, of course, bring it on (whats with the random emote-city thing).
OK, "noise" included read out noise (not obvious)., my mistake.
Darks double the image exposure time?, dont care about the scourse, thats not accepted practice. I dont know the math, I havent tried this, and I bet most other "credible and well respected international authorities" would be supprised at this revalation.
|
Ill ask the question again. Did you read the pdf?
Readout and other noise dominant.
This was the second heading. Not too difficult to miss. Last time I looked the attachment showed no views.
What does "dont care about the scourse" mean? Being a blunt tool I dont understand.
Also why the need to defend Peter? In my my opinion he is capable of rebutting any argument presented.Also my comments are not a personal attack, merely a surprised observation. I find that many on this forum are quick to dismiss other peoples point of view without attempting to justify their own position. As i have said previously, my expectations from this forum are robust debate, not innuendoes and pearl casting before the swine.
I have an opinion like every one else and I expect that if some disagrees with my opinion that they at least read it.
Regards
Steve
PS the random emoticons refer to my confusion with regards to your message.