View Single Post
  #6  
Old 18-02-2008, 08:30 AM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
I can only reiterate what the others have said. As to my personal preference, I would look at an EQ6 for the mount, particularly if imaging is, or is going to be a requirement. I own both an EQ6 and a HEQ5 and find the EQ6 a world above the HEQ5 although it is much bigger and much heavier. I would seriously consider the 8" or bigger Schmidt_Cassegrain for visual and would look at an ED80 for wide field photography of Deep Space objects. The diference between the 80 and 100 is focal speed. The 80 is a F7 and the 100 is a F9. Doesn't sound like much but it does make a significant diference in exposure times and also the 100 being 900mm long makes a diference to the magnification ratio with a camera fitted.
If you were to go with both scopes you would be in a position to mount them together on the EQ6 and use one as a dedicated guide scope to improve your tracking accuracy and allow you to take long exposures.

Food for thought
Good luck with it all, but think before you jump.
Reply With Quote