
13-02-2008, 02:16 PM
|
Southern Amateur
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 283
|
|
Why Have Competition of "Mate Against Mate"?
I seems to me you have two choices.
Submit your images under their rules (however distorted) or just not enter the competition.
Reading this seems there is far more at stake - akin to be more like the shabby competition for Miss World - and all the machinations that THAT entails - than among amateur astronomers doing their best all mostly producing absolutely significant wonderful works.
IMO I think that the judges of the images are just after original works by Imagers. Submissions are obviously to be judged impartially, among at least the entries they received - and how they were obtained. 
Frankly, I would be more far impressed with good images taken in a homemade 10.5cm telescope and camera, than someone who has all the (expensive) bells and whistles available to take the images.
Frankly, I have been far more impressed with the Imagers in IIS and their works, than any mere competition made by an unknown selection of their presumed peers. If I had the money, I'd give everyone who presents an image $1000 bucks, for the pleasure I get is viewing excellent images by seemingly dedicated and quality amateur photographers for FREE.
It should be all about non-monetary pride and personal achievement.
As one who doesn't have the opportunity to undertake such endeavours...
Regardless.
Mes' Tips My Lid to You...
Last edited by AJames; 13-02-2008 at 02:32 PM.
|