View Single Post
  #10  
Old 06-02-2008, 04:18 PM
Satchmo's Avatar
Satchmo
Registered User

Satchmo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starkler View Post
The reduced weight [of a 1.6" thick mirror] does however necessitate taller rocker and mirror boxes to accommodate higher mounting of the altitude bearings to achieve balance.
That applies only if you are dropping a thinner mirror into a scope allready designed for heavier , thicker mirrors. The best solution to balnce in using a thinner than 2" mirror is to make the top-end a fraction lighter without compromising stiffness. You can also just add a little weight to the mirror cell though I am not in favor off adding mass to a telescope.

There is typically a 5:1 moment arm leverage on a modern Dob. You don't need to shave off much weight off the top end to make up the difference in balance between a 1.6" and 2" mirror.
Reply With Quote