|
My goodness
I seem to have opened a can of worms here.
The point is, Peter had lots to say about eq6 in the last long saga of posts about the same issue.I asked a simple question about whether he thought the product had improved since 2005. I got rocks for an answer.
And now everyone jumps to defend him because i accused him of sarcasm and having a vested interest in the brands he represents. He has spent probably a hundred thousand dollars if not more on his gear and he therefore deserves a vested interest in that. I dont hold him in contempt because of that. All he had to say was yes it has no it hasnt whichever he felt. I read the whole saga previously posted and felt he was the best person to ask for an honest answer. The rock wasnt that.
I never asked about focal lengths or any of the other stuff just whether or not the product had improved in his opinion.
I thought i was wrong but i was mistaken.
Regards
Steve
PS Perhaps Peter should say something?
|