|
Sigh,
One last attempt - as you asked for advice...
What are you preferences in those 3 specific needs? Is it really so hard to answer?
* * * * * * * * *
Reading through your last post I'd advise you to check your initial research:
"Well Meade makes much bigger and more powerful telescopes like the max mount" - the Max mount is a mount not a telescope
"Well Meade makes much bigger telescopes" - they are pretty similar in size at most price points
"Well Meade makes much more powerful telescopes" - powerful how - do you imply some part of the optical train or body or optics are price point better?
"Unlike Celestron which makes ... telescopes that are light and easy to lag (sic) around" - I wasn't aware Meade and Celestron were wildy varied in OTA weight - design and composition determines that.
"Unlike Celestron which makes more stable telescopes" - stable in what sense?
"Although Celestron makes rough scopes " - do you mean rugged and durable or poor performance - neither is true above the toy price point - they perform but you'd better not drop them.
"Meade has allot (sic) more power to it's products" - what is this magic power Meade gives you?
"So it's your choice power or portability" - power - no idea what you mean - capability for a class of viewing object or pointing or viewing ability maybe? portability - really stems from mass to carry I'd guess.
"For example if you were in a metropolitan area you would much rather buy a Celestron simply because if you wanted to get away from the lights you would have to travel rural but if you where county you would much rather have a permanent strong scope such as a Meade." - that made no sense to me, did it truly make any sense to you?
|