Quote:
Originally Posted by sheeny
Very nice, Eric!
Looks like some very faint loops to the nebulosity that might be worth a deeper shot.
Al.
|
totally agree with you Al. i tend to image a couple of objects each imaging session so my avereage will be the 1 - 1 1/2 hour mark per object. when the clouds clear i see if i can stretch it abit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by glenc
A great image of one of my favorite objects, thanks Eric.
It is easy to see 3199 visually with a UHC filter.
|
cheers glen. Really? i even had trouble imaging it seeing it will be quite hard from my location.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric
Well done Eric, It's great to see images of other lesser known nebulae and this is a fine example.
Those faint loops look interesting and as Al said it might be worth a deeper shop to bring them up.
Cheers
|
cheers Ric. thanks. longer expo will sure do it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy
nice result eric, but I think you could do with some more time on this object, as I think the neb is larger than is shown in your shot. I would say that maybe a few hours worth of time would do this justice instead of the 1 hour you managed to bang out. mate look long and hard at the heat noise - that new cooled 40D that Yun is developing has your name all over it---LOL.
|
LOL thanks houghy. think the longest on an object was 2 1/2 hours . havnt past that at this stage. should spend 1 night entirely on 1 object but just too tempting to go and look for others. is Yun developing a cooled 40D?? I thought just the 400D?? *droollllingg*