View Single Post
  #9  
Old 07-01-2008, 10:18 AM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil View Post
05:55:31, 226.00, 184.96, 0.04, -0.00, -0.05, 0.00, 8574
05:55:32, 226.00, 185.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 9252
05:55:33, 226.00, 185.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 9665
05:55:34, 226.00, 185.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 9896
05:55:35, 226.00, 185.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 9773
05:55:36, 226.00, 185.00, -0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 11518
05:55:37, 226.00, 185.00, -0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 8941
05:55:39, 225.99, 185.02, -0.02, -0.01, 0.02, 0.00, 9487
Geez Phil, I looked at these stats and thought "Wow", could you get it any better than this? But then I realised that you're guiding close to every second so kind of expected. Note sure of the arcsec/pixel combination you're running, but do find your chasing the seeing at such short exposure times?

Note to Matt: Make sure you take into account the guiding intervals, focal length and arcsec/pixel for comparison.
Reply With Quote