View Single Post
  #4  
Old 05-01-2008, 12:28 PM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,902
Agreed,

With big fat stars I assume PHD does a statistically wieghted centroid calculation - so turbulence could affect the shape of the star if its say 4 * 4 pixels wide and PHD has to guess which pixel - down to a tenth of a pixel it should judge the centroid from.

So I try and aim for the smallest stars that I can fine that don't dim out.

When I see stars jumping that much in a frame by frame shot I wonder what chance PHD (or any guide software has and think either my MAK needs collimination - and urgently) or the DSI / MAK combination just isn't really good!

I still wonder why PHD is issuing such a large move that it takes the guide star out of the search frame?

Possibly the star jumps say 1 pixel left by seeing then PHD issues a 1 pixel left correction - sees no change so does it again - then the seeing reverts and the star is 1 pixel to the right - but if this is the worse case then the star should only be 3 pixel out of position - not 12 or 14.

Amazing how frustrating this is!
Reply With Quote