Quote:
Originally Posted by theodog
I agree. However, lets distinguish between photographic art and science. Both have their place. One advertises the other. Many more have seen D. Malin's wonderfull images than the hours of images that provided cutting edge astronomical science.
It's horses for courses. To throw in an old building trade proverb "one does the best job with the available tools and time"  .
If its better than your previous attemp then its the best one. 
Cheers |
well said Jeff. It reminds me of a talk at the first Lostock IIS camp where the same question was asked, "does one process for scientific accuracy, or to make it "look better"?
As for the images here I think one 1/2way between would be the best. The image scale closely matches my 10 inch f5.6 newtonian too.
Scott