|
Well I counted 9 logical fallacies and several outright lies.
Even as early as the second scentence we are told that there has been no hard evidence for conventional models of geology???
It's the same old same old. (logical fallacy)
e.g. If you can find just one annomally, we must throw out all knowledge aquired so far.
The false dichotomy arbitrarily reduces a set of many possibilities to only two. Their example - Evolution is not possible, therefor we must have been created. Creation wins by default?? (same old...)
Here are some of the logical fallacies that I noticed in one viewing.
-Ad hominem
-Ad ignoratiam
-Confusing association with causation
-Confusing currently unexplainded with unexplainable..... therefore..
-False dichotomy
-Argument from personal incredulity
-False continum
-Non-sequitur (latin 'doen't follow')
-Straw man
Don't forget that publishing in a peer reviewed joural means that you get a 'look in', and not a pass.
One of the reasons that this is not science is that they all ready have their cause and effect hypothesis self verified. Here is the effect-Plutonium Halo....here is the cause- (G##).
If you use this as a premis, we now have another logical fallacy
-Tautology!
|