View Single Post
  #4  
Old 08-11-2007, 07:34 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Interesting comments jase, I can understand your points.

It definitely feels like I get less image data when using the Astronomik Luminance filter than without, but I have to admit I haven't done any scientific testing of it - I will do that and see what the results are, I'll be most interested.

Focussing is an issue for me, it's very rare that I can perform an auto-focus on the FOV that I'm imaging. There's never anything bright enough (small FOV, faint galaxies, purposefully removing bright stars that might bloom, avoiding it trying to autofocus on a galaxy, etc). So refocusing for each filter isn't practical.

You mention determining an offset for focusing - not sure how I would integrate that with my imaging runs in CCDSoft or CCDCommander.

Considering those focusing issues the "sure it makes imaging a little easier" means it's more like "it makes imaging a lot easier" for me

Roger.
Reply With Quote