I have to agree with most of the others in labelling that discussion as drivel. It's so typical of the way these comparisons somehow threaten the reputation of Naglers, even though we all know Naglers are excellent products, but somehow, nothing else is accepted as excellent too, or possible preferrable to some. And usually even though no one has even suggested Naglers are anything less than premium optics. To me, it's boring and tiring. Now if the discussions were around the more subtle differences between the 2 types and opinions about their virtues in a balanced and truthful way, then fair enough. "Mushy?" That guy hasn't really looked through one I suspect. And he's a "photographer"...so what! I know photographers who are colourblind, or not artistically inclined at all.
Clear skies,
Nick
|