|
I can see where you are coming from...perhaps I should make my view clearer...
I suggest the pushing force is universal and constant...and left alone it does not obey the inverse square law...its power does not diminish over the Universe ( without getting sidetracked on local variations due to major events such as a super nova etc).
Where I say it obeys the inverse square rule perhaps that is misinterpreted so I will set out what I mean when I say that it does.
It is the observation of the end result I suppose I say does not offend the law of inverse square.
The force or power of this flow I suggest will be the same I expect through out the Universe ... the operation of the inverse square law will however be observed where two bodies "shadow"or "shield" each other mutually from the overall flow ... it is the "shielding"or "shadowing" that in effect provides a region of less pressure such that the bodies are inclined or pushed to this region.
The inverse square law simply will tell us as bodies are further apart the shielding will be reduced and obey the inverse square law.
So I say the flow of these unidentified particles do not obey the law of inverse square law as such but the principle of the shadowing does.
I expect you wont see this for some time maybe I should do a drawing...
AND please I dont wish for you to see me as argumentative or trying to prove a point but merely to explain what may be a misunderstanding of the way I see the inverse square law fitting in the manner I see.
Kenny if reason prevails I will open a new thread here so there is a place we can cover each point as it is raised as opposed to me "pushing" the discussion we are having on the idea into Glen's thread.
AS I have said before in various places I dont see any conflict between DrA ,Newton and Push gravity loosely speaking...
I do look forward to how you interpret Dr A's explanation as to how light is bent within the frame work of space time... again I agree that it does and say push gravity (the way I see it) supports DrA's reasonably well established view on this.
By the time you read this there may well be a new thread.
Others in the push gravity world seem to be determined to prove DrA wrong seeking him out as the top gun and therefore destroy his ideas as if theirs were better ...Dr A is one of my hero's and I dont see what he says as wrong.. there are things I dont understand true..but I dont see my ideas in conflict with his at all as space time suggest no machinery that effects the curvature of space... I think I said earlier I think it is the flow of these "corpuscles" that in effect bend the grid of space time ..a mere explanation of the machinery of the relationship space time provides for the relationship of masses.
I hope by the time you read this you have returned with your observatory and very happy with that result.
best wishes.
alex
|