|
I will be a long time on the videos and can not thank you enough...
I think I can say at this early stage that Mr Le Sage's general approach is where I am coming from.
I am working through all the reasons I can find against his approach and that is going to take some time...
But being positive at this early stage I don't see a conflict...don't pull your hair out and give up on me... I simply think of things this way...
Space time and General Relativity ( to group the current ideas that may apparently oppose the Le Sage approach ) do not seem to offer a mechanical explanation... and I simply believe that there must be a mechanical explanation...
I can not except that one body of mass has a relationship with another body of mass simply because the physics says so and nothing more need be explained... I can not except the approach that "īt just is" and believe there must be more taking place than "sums".
I think there must be a physical machinery where one body relates to another... it has always been this part of the "how"that intrigues me... all my reading has been to find what science says on this aspect.
The more I read the more I became convinced that there is no explanation on the mechanical operation ... and in that environment not being able to find a mechanical explanation I guess I invent my own... crude and unscientific but as I say try as I have I have found nothing to satisfy me as to how it works...
So in the course of my pursuit I have formed various views which leave anyone listening to those views thinking I am a crackpot..as well I am really... I don't mind that at all.. what else could they think..so I do not take being labeled so as a personal affront.
But on the serious side I must find the answer to the question I ask myself and am driven by that...
I feel that without a mechanical understanding as to how gravity works all the knowledge that relates to everything we think we know is suspect.
As the current thinking sees gravity in effect as a force of attraction I believe it leads us in the wrong direction.
AS you would have gathered if gravity pushes and does not work by attraction the need for dark matter I believe disappears... I do not buy the dark matter premise and at this point really believe those who think it is there are wrong.
If nothing else this can only see me wearing the crown of king crack pot but I sincerely believe I am right... I do not like to think that given the importance current thinking attaches to dark matter that is simply a mystery and we must be content with understanding it is there but forever rely on its proof by inference... I do not accept this can be so.
I will not accept it is so and therefore look for a more reasonable explanation ..one that does not require such an unsupportable leap of faith
...and so I am a minority of one.
Thanks again Ken I will work hard on everything you have pointed me to.
best wishes
alex
|