|
Hi Matt
I had the same choice ... CPC11 or LX200 ... but went for the CPC11 and it arrived in April this year. I must say that I have been very pleased with the quality of the scope and tripod. The scope sits rock solid on the tripod, the focusing knob is smooth and precise, and I have found the finderscope to be of good quality and well engineered .... it has remained accurately aligned to the main scope since I set it up over the past 5 months ago. After a few clumsy practice runs I have found it fairly easy to lift the scope onto and off the tripod - but remember the scope/arm assembly is not light. The handset and goto software are easy to use and really does makes one's time at the eyepiece very efficient as it is easy to hop from one object to the other, especially in tour mode. I must admit that I do have the occasional hiccup when using 3-star skyalign but this may well be something I am doing wrong in the inky blackness of my backyard as I usually have success I repeat the alignment procedure**. When seeing is goog the views through the my CPC11 have been absolutely fabulous (very clear, sharp and bright) ... I was blown away when I first viewed the Orion Neb and Jupiter.
Bottom line ..... I am pleased that I opted for the CPC11.
Regards
David
** I wonder whether anyone has found that the displayed local time (after link-up) is incorrect. The other night I corrected the reported local time (5 hours out) and then found that my skyalign was unsuccessful. Unfortunately clouds invaded and I have not had a chance to look at this.
|