|
I understand the alignments but use another method so as to head off the havoc caused by those using the alignment system.
I wish you luck in your quest.. however being negative I really don't think the complexities of alignments could be understood even if they were relevant to future events.
Think of the difficulties of weather prediction ..which in comparison would be a simple exercise.
May I caution you as to the use of the word theory... it is a word that in science almost means the reverse to the popular meaning.
In short for a theory to meet scientific requirement ..it starts with an idea generated from an observation...as such the idea can be put to the test by making a prediction as to what will occur when the principles of the idea are applied... if the prediction is as predicted then we have the start of a theory... some take it at this point a theory is a fact but in truth it awaits destruction from a better more competent theory.
The big bang is a theory..many see it as fact as many predictions fit the predictions of the theory... yet it remains and will always remain a theory capable of being displaced by a better theory with more accurate predictions.
Have a great time with building your idea to the high status of theory...
I heard a chap on the radio who predicts earthquakes from the alignment of the planets... it sounded strange ...but when asked when he saw another quake..he replied well there should be something today... later that day there was a major earth quake... so his prediction was correct... does this make him right??? not in every ones book as his prediction could be written off to coincidence... still I wish I could put you onto him ... he may share a similar view to the one you are formulating.
alex
|