View Single Post
  #10  
Old 19-12-2004, 01:25 PM
silvinator's Avatar
silvinator
Lady Post-a-holic

silvinator is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra, ACT, Australia
Posts: 448
Hey Doug, I reckon the 100mm would be more of a grab and go than my current setup though! If I was just setting up by myself, my setup would take me 4 or five trips - tripod, mount head and rings, then counterweights and shaft, then the tube and then the accessories case. And that's just for a quick observing run. For a little sheila like me, that's a bit of strenous exercise in itslef! If I'm attempting astrophotography, it's another trip to get both digital and film cameras and the tripod. With , it's a little easier but I want something less painful to setup. SO maybe I should look at the 80mm instead?
Hey Starkler, that makes me feel a little better but then again, it doesn't as that means I may never see the critter until I move or create a massive blackout

Last edited by silvinator; 19-12-2004 at 01:28 PM.
Reply With Quote