Thread: DSLR Camera
View Single Post
  #5  
Old 31-07-2007, 11:09 AM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ingo View Post
The 400D wasn't any improvement from the 350D besides 2 more megapixels and a bigger screen which only eats more of Canon's really bad batteries. Go for a 350D, nobody complains about it and it doesn't have all the extra junk the 400D has like the dust removal, which doesn't work.
Or the 300D has a firmware hack to enable ISO3200.
Wow, is this from direct experience Ingo or from what you've read on the net?
Reply With Quote