I agree with Mike, Ken. I like No 2 better but the colour is too blue (making the red nebulae go purple). I'd try correcting that with colour balance.
The stars in No2 show better resolution, but the usual ToUcam long exposure bloom. The bloomed stars in No1 have rounded off in some cases so it looks more natural than No 2... but then you realize how much detail has been lost. It think the detail in the nebula in No2 is better, even though the nebulae looks brighter in No 1. I'm pretty sure No 1 is a deeper image judging by the brightness of the faint parts of the nebula and the size of the star images (I am right, aren't I?) I just wonder if the contrast in the nebulae detail will drop when the colour balance is corrected?
The black rings around the stars are wavelet artifacts from sharpening the image I think... I assume they are not there on your captured frames...
Knowing what ToUcam blooming looks like I probably tolerate it a bit more than others might for the sake of the resolution in image 2.
Well done BTW.
Al.