[a1120028]

I wondered if I was going mad, I'm starting my honors in mathematical physics next year and as I came up through my undergraduate years I started noticing holes in the big bang model. A number of my papers came back although well marked they always had comments on them like "this is very ambitious", or "I advise you to keep these ideas to yourself if you want a job", all I was pointing out in these papers was that conclusions reached by making too many assumptions are not very solid. Especially if these assumptions are made in order to make an aspect of said model fit with current data. I believe that there is a non cosmological component to redshift especially when in relation to quasars, if this turns out to be the case there is no need for dark matter or dark energy to explain the motion of galaxies and also casts doubt on the expansion as it stands. Maybe I'm a crack pot but it just seems in light of everything I've studied over the years that there is something very wrong with the big bang model as it stands. Time will tell I guess but in the meantime I'll plug away at it with my pencil and always faithful mathematics.